Entries Tagged as 'Liberal Hysteria'

American Exceptionalism and Liberal Projection

In psychology, psychological projection (or projection bias) is a defense mechanism in which one attributes one’s own unacceptable or unwanted thoughts or/and emotions to others. Projection reduces anxiety by allowing the expression of the unwanted subconscious impulses/desires without letting the conscious mind recognize them.

See Psychological Projection for more detail.

In today’s New York Times, Roger Cohen has an op-ed entitled Palin’s American Exception which is a classic example of liberal psychological projection.

[Read more →]

He’s black, he’s cool, he makes the Left drool

Good American Thinker article by James Lewis.

Quotes:

As the fringe likes to say, “It’s only justice.” Think about that word “justice” and try filling in “revenge.” “Social justice” means the revenge of the poor against the rich, of the radical women against the men who’ve stood them up and hurt their feelings all their lives, and the revenge of black people finally doin’ down the whites — as Jeremiah Wright makes so abundantly clear.

“Social justice” is the revenge of the psychologically oppressed against people who look happier and more satisfied with their lives.

The Left is entitled to power, because in their own eyes they have Truth and Morality on their side. They are Mahatma Gandhi, they are Dr. King, they are the vanguard of the marching proletariat. It’s not just Big O who has the incomprehensible egomania. His inner circle and vast numbers of his supporters do, too. Entitlement, grandiosity, narcissism: In psychiatric thinking they all suffer from secret feelings of inferiority, narcissistic wounds to their self-esteem. Every time they lose, those nagging feelings come up again. So they are always overcompensating, trying to bully reality into the shape they need.

Senator O’s campaign started with an attack on Sarah Palin, but caught itself fast and backed off. Attacking the lady without careful planning would have been disastrous. Instead, unattributed rumors are circulating in the Leftosphere: Palin’s Down Syndrome baby wasn’t really hers, there is secret corruption in her past, and more. These wild, vicious slanders are trotted out mainly to satisfy the emotional needs of their authors. The nasty, vicious quality is a signal of irrational, narcissistic rage.

Obama’s Towering Ego - Grecian Style

News flash, Citizen Obama is going to give his acceptance speech on Thursday from a set that looks like a Greek temple.

Obama\'s Greek Temple

In a mixing of visual metaphors, Obama is also going to do something with a mock-up of Air Force One.

Obama\'s Air Force On

This is certainly going to build on Michelle’s “We’re just ordinary folks” theme from the first night.

via The Daily Mail

UPDATE: Here’s a look at Barack’s costume for tomorrow night.

Citizen Obama

Via The Political Inquirer

Saint Obama and Socialist Redemption

“Let us not forget that Marxism, as the one great political force of our twentieth century, made its appearance with the claim to be bringing a new world of freedom and of free people. This very promise of knowing the scientifically guaranteed way to freedom, and of creating the new world, drew to it many of the boldest spirits of our age; ultimately it even appeared as the force through which the Christian teaching of redemption could be transformed into a realistic practical means for liberation - as the force that could bring the Kingdom of God as the true kingdom of men. The collapse of realist socialism in the East European states has not quite laid aside all such hopes, and here and there they still subsist, silently awaiting some new form.”
— Pope Benedict XVI; Truth and Tolerance; p. 233; (emphasis added)

Wherever politics tries to be redemptive, it is promising too much. Where it wishes to do the work of God, it becomes, not divine, but demonic.
— Pope Benedict XVI; Truth and Tolerance; p. 116

Drill, Johnnie, Drill!

John McCain wants to drill for oil. Barack Obama wants to drill for taxes and leave the oil where it is.

In McCain Rows The Boat Offshore, Hallelujah!, Investors Business Daily lays it all out.

John McCain visits California to make the case for offshore drilling. The oil spill off Santa Barbara was 40 years ago. It’s time to stop crying over spilled oil.

Just as he courageously opposed subsidies for energy-inefficient ethanol before the Iowa caucus, whose mandated use has driven up food prices, the presumptive GOP nominee ventured to electoral-vote-rich California on Monday to repeat his support for offshore drilling. His call comes despite lingering California angst over the 1969 Santa Barbara oil spill that prompted current restrictions off the California coast.

Critics of offshore drilling, including California Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger, use the spill of 80,000 barrels of crude some six miles off Santa Barbara nearly four decades ago to block efforts to recover the 1.3 billion barrels of recoverable oil off the California coast. Schwarzenegger has suggested he wouldn’t mind being “energy czar” in an Obama administration. Obama opposes offshore drilling.

I’m not a giant fan of McCain, but when your choice is between something bad and something even worse, you can’t sit this one out or waste your vote with Bob Barr.

If you combine Barack and Nancy and Harry, you’ve got a bullet in the head of the economy that we’ll pay for over the next ten years.

Remember when Jimmy Carter persuaded a Democrat congress to set the speed limit at 55? (Hint: 1974) Remember how long it took to get rid of the most hated federal law in the nation? (Hint: 1995) Apply that legislative timeline to taxes designed to redistribute income and you’ll get an idea of how much damage little Barry can do.

Uncle Al’s Great Climate Leap Forward

Maximum Leader Al Gore has a little leap he’d like you to make.

Like a modern Jeremiah, Mr. Gore called down thunder to justify the spending of trillions of dollars to remake the American power system, a plan fraught with technological and political challenges that goes far beyond the changes recently debated in Congress and by world leaders.

“The survival of the United States of America as we know it is at risk,” he said in a midday speech to a friendly crowd of mostly young supporters in Washington. “And even more — if more should be required — the future of human civilization is at stake.”


With a straight face, the New York Times actually acted like Mao tse Gore was not to be laughed off the stand.

Apparently, there was something in the air because others were levitating as well.

“Mr. Gore is continuing his talent of identifying the key challenges, emphasizing urgency and translating it to a broad audience. That’s terrific,” said Ernest J. Moniz, director of the energy initiative at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and a former under secretary at the Department of Energy in the Clinton administration. “Everyone agrees that the solution to the climate challenge is decarbonization and the first place to go is the electricity sector. Can we get there that fast? Obviously it’s very, very tough.”

Brett Stephens must have been holding his breath because he captured the looniness of Jeremiah Gore and his mindless acolytes in his op-ed in the Wall Street Journal.

[Gore] thinks that simply by declaring an emergency he can help achieve Stakhanovite results. He might recall what the Stakhanovite myth (about the man who mined 14 times his quota of coal in six hours) actually did to the Soviet economy.

A more interesting question is why Mr. Gore remains believable. Perhaps people think that facts ought not to count against a man whose task is to raise our sights, or play Cassandra to unbelieving mortals.

Or maybe he is believed simply because people want something in which to believe. “The readiness for self-sacrifice,” wrote Eric Hoffer in “The True Believer,” “is contingent on an imperviousness to the realities of life. . . . All active mass movements strive, therefore, to interpose a fact-proof screen between the faithful and the realities of the world. They do this by claiming that the ultimate and absolute truth is already embodied in their doctrine and that there is no truth nor certitude outside it. . . . To rely on the evidence of the senses and of reason is heresy and treason. It is startling to realize how much unbelief is necessary to make belief possible.”

We Absolutely Can Drill Our Way Out

A good post from Hugh Hewitt - Memo to the Bush Administration: If Drilling Is That Important, Act That Way via On the Other Hand (thanks for the mention!)

The Obama-Pelosi-Reid Don’t Drill Democrats aren’t budging in their opposition to seeking new oil supplies, as the electoral benefits they envision from high gas prices far outweigh their concern over the damage done to individual Americans and the U.S. economy from the oil shock. They’d rather win the presidency and expand their majorities in the House and the Senate than bring price relief to average Americans and shore up a shaky manufacturing sector buffeted by skyrocketing energy costs.

Democrats of course say in unison “We can’t drill our way out of this,” but in fact we can. More oil production means lower gas prices –it is that simple.

Democrats say it will take too long, but markets react to short and medium term developments, and a firm commitment to new supplies would immediately impact those markets.

Democrats try and throw dirt in our collective eyes, using the most inane talking point of the year about unused leases –as though Americans don’t understand that not all leased land holds oil and that oil companies don’t sit on proven reserves that they lose control of over time.

The recognition has broken through and is spreading that a vote for any democrat is a vote for soaring gas prices and a shrinking economy. Add in Obama’s feverish tax hike plans, and the recipe for an economic disaster is on the table to go along with Obama’s incredibly risky plans to retreat from Iraq and sit down with Ahmadinejad and Chavez for “no-preconditions” talks.

The Frozen North

I received the following in an email from a friend who did not write it. I think it’s brilliant, but can’t give the author credit. If any of you know who the author is, please let me know so I can provide proper attribution.

FIRST, do you know what ANWR is?

ANWR = Arctic National Wildlife Refuge.

Now A comparison

Wailing and Crying in DC

Excellent opinion piece in Investors Business Daily this morning:

Watching Democrat leaders in Washington respond to skyrocketing gas prices has been nothing short of a tutorial on the five stages of grief.

Weeks of conspicuous silence (denial). Lashing out at the oil companies, the White House, the markets, the oil companies again (anger). Repeated pronouncements that prices would stabilize at one point or another in the not-too-distant future (bargaining). The long faces trying to explain away their failure to pass a single energy bill that creates energy (depression).

Sen. Barack Obama topped it all off by saying he had hoped the rise in gas prices would have been a “gradual adjustment” so American families could adapt to the reality of four-buck gasoline. Acceptance.

For Obama, there is some cathartic value in paying four bucks for a gallon of gasoline. Tell that to the independent trucker paying $1,500 to fill up, or the school districts eliminating bus stops — or entire routes, for that matter. Tell that to the family that didn’t have the resources to carry out its travel plans over July Fourth.

On this issue, Washington isn’t just broken — it’s AWOL. Roadblocks to reform efforts have been reinforced by shopworn rhetoric and retread initiatives. Real initiatives have been supplanted by a mealy-mouth hodgepodge of supposed cure-alls, one more ineffectual than the next

The Dems were supposed to have such a good year then this nasty oil price thing comes rolling in. The party is in thrall to the eco-left and can’t win without them, but all these pesky voters aren’t willing to sit still and pay $4.00 for a gallon of gas.

Harry Reid is just sick about oil, coal, the whole thing.

Global Warming = Mental Illness?

Bret Stephens has a wonderful opinion piece in the Wall Street Journal, Global Warming as Mass Neurosis.

He opens:

Last week marked the 20th anniversary of the mass hysteria phenomenon known as global warming. Much of the science has since been discredited. Now it’s time for political scientists, theologians and psychiatrists to weigh in.

Stephens discusses some inconvenient truths:

  • The hottest year on record in the continental 48 was not 1998, as previously believed, but 1934
  • Six of the 10 hottest years since 1880 antedate 1954
  • Data from 3,000 scientific robots in the world’s oceans show there has been slight cooling in the past five years
  • The extent of Antarctic sea ice has been expanding for years
  • As of February, last winter was the Northern Hemisphere’s coldest in decades
  • German climate modelers reported in the journal Nature that global warming is due for a decade-long vacation.

[Read more →]